The virtuous cycle of
Greenlighting Starter Home Construction
- More homes
- Stronger families
- Stronger communities
Green Light starter homes
sets a virtuous cycle in motion
The State of Starter Homes in America, 2026
America is losing starter homes.
Starter homes, 2015 to 2024A starter home is valued at or below 4 times the county median household income.10% of the homes here that existed in 2014 are probability-based. The rest are observed.This figure leaves out 3% of the homes here that existed in 2014: there are no 2014 home values in their state.Built counts homes built from 2015 to 2024 that are starter homes in December 2024, by the starter home time series. The 1.3 million below counts homes built from 2015 to 2024 that are starter homes at December 2025 home values.
Lost
Built1.4 million
12.7 millionstarter homes lost, net, as home prices rose faster than incomes
Home prices rose faster than incomes, pushing 14 million homes past 4 times county income. New construction added only 1.4 million starter homes.15.3 million rose past 4 times county income; 1.3 million fell back under. Net: 14 million.
10 lost for every one built.
Explore the Starter Home AtlasGreen Light building starter homes on smaller lots
Starter homes, out of every 10 single-family homes2015 stock: Homes valued at or below 4 times county median income, December 2014.Today's stock: Homes valued at or below 4 times county median income, December 2025.New homes: Of the single-family homes built 2015 to 2024, those worth at most 4 times county median income in the year built. Of the homes built 1990 to 2014, 4 in 10 were starter homes when built.With smaller lots: Capping minimum lot sizes in new neighborhoods at 1,000 sq. ft.
+2.4Mmore starter homes could have been built from 2015 to 2024 with Green Light smaller lots.U.S.: There is no figure for this place. This row shows the United States.
See your state, metro, county or city.
Where we build starter homes
Texas built 517,724 starter homes from 2015 to 2024, 40% of the national total.1AEI Housing Center, Starter Home Atlas (December 2025 home values; ACS 2020-2024 5-year incomes)
- 1Texas517,724
- 2Florida88,004
- 3Georgia71,436
- 4North Carolina58,136
- 5Oklahoma38,325
Starter homes built per 1,000 households, 2015 to 2024
- Under 2
- 2 to 4.9
- 5 to 9.9
- 10 to 19.9
- 20 or more
About 90% of cities and towns set a minimum lot size, a forthcoming AEI Housing Center report finds. Every home must then carry the cost of that land. The fix caps the minimum lot size in new neighborhoods at 1,000 square feet. Builders and buyers can still choose larger lots.2Tobias Peter and Edward Pinto, AEI Housing Center, If You Care About Housing Abundance, Minimum Lot Sizes Deserve Much More Attention (forthcoming)
Starter homes in new neighborhoods, 2015 to 2024Built in new neighborhoods: starter homes in new residential subdivisions, where the cap would apply. This count is smaller than the national count at the top of the page, which covers every single-family home.
3.1 millionwith smaller lots greenlitAfter greenlighting smaller lots: starter homes built in new neighborhoods from 2015 to 2024, plus the number the Green Light Starter Homes tool estimates if no local rule required a lot larger than 1,000 square feet. Home values are December 2025 estimates.3AEI Housing Center, End the Ban on Building Starter Homes tool (Playbook 2.0), national figures at the tool's defaults: minimum lot sizes in new residential subdivisions capped at 1,000 sq. ft., and a starter home valued at or below 4.0 times county median household income
Counting every kind of home, starter homes included, smaller lots add about 4 million.
See it for your state in Green Light Starter HomesTwo lots, drawn to scale
States are greenlighting smaller lots
3 states have passed a law: Idaho, Kansas and Maine. Texas also passed SB 15, a landmark starter home bill, in 2025. 18 states introduced a bill in 2026.4AEI Housing Center state legislative tracker, AEI 2026 State Housing Supply Legislation Update, as of October 19, 2026
Bills to greenlight smaller lots, by state
- Enacted
- Pending
- Introduced, not passed
- No bill
Two national surveys show that Americans favor homes they can own, and that support for smaller lots depends on how the proposal is described.
of adults ages 18 to 54 would like to live in a detached single-family house or a townhouse.
Broader context, not a direct measure of starter home demand. Institute for Family Studies, 2024.5Institute for Family Studies, Homes for Young Families: A Pro-Family Housing Agenda (Cox and Stone, March 2025), Housing, Neighborhoods, and Family Formation Survey, August 2024, adults ages 18 to 54prefer starter homes people can own over smaller rentals in their neighborhood.
May and September 2026 surveys together, among those who took a side. The ratio uses the unrounded shares, 57.4% and 4.4%.6AEI Housing Center, national surveys of adults, May and September 2026 (Ipsos KnowledgePanel). Shares are among those who took a side.support a state law allowing more affordably priced starter homes on smaller lots, for first-time buyers, young families and local workers.
Among those who took a side, September 2026 survey; asked of a third of people.6AEI Housing Center, national surveys of adults, May and September 2026 (Ipsos KnowledgePanel). Shares are among those who took a side.Support, by how the reform is described
Also notable: in a separate question, 80% supported smaller lots in new neighborhoods after reading arguments against them and for them, side by side.
80%
Read the 6 arguments against and the 6 for
| Against smaller lots | For smaller lots |
|---|---|
| Builders will keep the savings as profit, so homes will not cost less. | Large lots raise the cost of each home. Smaller lots let builders sell starter homes for less. |
| One state rule would apply to towns with very different needs. | A state law can target places with fast growth, high costs or few starter homes. |
| More homes bring more traffic and more load on roads, schools and water systems. | New neighborhoods must still meet local rules for roads, water, sewer and drainage, and they add taxpayers. |
| Smaller lots mean less yard, less privacy and fewer trees. | A mix of lot sizes gives buyers more choices, including less expensive starter homes. |
| Local governments need to set their own standards. | The state can allow smaller lots and still let towns enforce safety and drainage rules. |
| Locally elected officials should make these decisions. | Housing shortages cross town lines, so the state has a role. |
Among those who took a side, September 2026 survey. The questions used different wording and, for the state law, a third of the people. The gaps show how answers differ by description, not the effect of any one phrase.6AEI Housing Center, national surveys of adults, May and September 2026 (Ipsos KnowledgePanel). Shares are among those who took a side.
Why it matters
People back a specific state law for smaller lots, not only a general wish for more housing. The law says what gets built, where it gets built and who gets a chance to own a home. That gives lawmakers a concrete way to talk about reform while answering worries about neighborhood change. Support in a survey does not by itself pass a law.
About 80% recognize the need, and half feel it strongly
-
The affordability challenge
79%call housing affordability in their area at least somewhat serious.
44% extremely or very serious, 35% somewhat.
-
The importance of starter homes
80%call more affordably priced starter homes in their community at least somewhat important.
51% extremely or very important, 30% somewhat.
May and September 2026 surveys together, among those who took a side.6AEI Housing Center, national surveys of adults, May and September 2026 (Ipsos KnowledgePanel). Shares are among those who took a side.
Go deeper
Starter Home Atlas
See every state, metro, county and city.
Open the atlas How could we build more? +2.4 millionmore starter homes with smaller lotsGreen Light Starter Homes
See it state by state and county by county.
Open the tool