AEI State Housing Supply Legislative Tracker

State Housing Supply Legislative Tracker
270,015*
potential new homes per year
“Small Lots, Small Lots, Small Lots”
23 states with legislation
85 housing bills tracked
Updated March 2026


States with Housing Legislation

Ranked by annual supply increase. Click a state for details.

1
Rhode Island
Top Impact
2K*
potential new homes/year
+113% annual supply increase
2
Washington
Top Impact
37K*
potential new homes/year
+97% annual supply increase
3
Hawaii
Top Impact
4K*
potential new homes/year
+97% annual supply increase
4
Maryland
Top Impact
19K*
potential new homes/year
+96% annual supply increase
5
Florida
Top Impact
97K*
potential new homes/year
+86% annual supply increase
6
New Mexico
6K*
potential new homes/year
+81% annual supply increase
7
Kansas
6K*
potential new homes/year
+66% annual supply increase
8
Massachusetts
11K*
potential new homes/year
+62% annual supply increase
9
Idaho
7K*
potential new homes/year
+62% annual supply increase
10
Minnesota
10K*
potential new homes/year
+50% annual supply increase
11
Kentucky
9K*
potential new homes/year
+49% annual supply increase
12
North Carolina
26K*
potential new homes/year
+41% annual supply increase
13
Colorado
13K*
potential new homes/year
+40% annual supply increase
14
Michigan
8K*
potential new homes/year
+35% annual supply increase
15
Virginia
12K*
potential new homes/year
+33% annual supply increase
16
Connecticut
1K*
potential new homes/year
+19% annual supply increase
17
Missouri
2K*
potential new homes/year
+7% annual supply increase
18
Nebraska
300*
potential new homes/year
+4% annual supply increase
19
West Virginia
40*
potential new homes/year
+1% annual supply increase
20
Indiana
0*
potential new homes/year
21
New Hampshire
0*
potential new homes/year
22
Utah
0*
potential new homes/year
23
Wyoming
0*
potential new homes/year

Colorado

13K* potential new homes/year +40% annual supply increase 2 bills
View State Playbook
HB26-1114 Moderate
13K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #1-2
Subject jurisdictions may not require a parcel to have an area larger than 2,000 sq.ft. if the parcel's residential use is limited to a single-family home. Does not apply to exempt parcels (no public water/sewer or historic properties).
Methodology

Data is limited to land within subject jurisdictions, defined as either (1) a municipality that has a population of at least 1,000, as reported by the state demography office, and is within a metropolitan planning organization or (2) the portion of a county that is within a census designated place with a population of 40,000 or more, as reported in the most recent decennial census, and within a metropolitan planning organization. Municipality population totals from the Colorado state demography office were obtained from the SDO's data resource page. Population totals from the decennial census use the 2020 census. Data is further limited to land within Colorado Water and Sanitation Districts, obtained from the Colorado Geospatial Portal. At a minimum lot size of 2,000 sq.ft., we assume a distribution of lot sizes that yields approximately 12 homes per acre, on average. For lot splits, we assume that the minimum lot size applies; thus, a lot must be at least 4,000 sq.ft. in order to be eligible for a lot split.

HB26-1001 Narrow Applicability
Impact not yet quantified
Playbook Options #3
Legalizes multifamily housing on certain types of land such as nonprofit land, public transit nonprofits, school districts, state colleges/universities, housing authorities, or local/regional transit districts. Qualifying property must be <=5 acres. Applies to local governments with population >2,000.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Connecticut

1K* potential new homes/year +19% annual supply increase 1 bills
View State Playbook
SB 151 Moderate
1K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #1-2
Prohibits zoning regulations from adopting minimum lot sizes >5,000 sq.ft. in areas with public water and sewer, minimum square footage for single-family homes or townhomes, and lot coverage maximums. Permits townhomes in single-family residential zoning districts and allows existing lots to be split into up to three lots.
Methodology

For this analysis, the 5,000 sq.ft. cap applies to new residential subdivisions and lot splits, corresponding to Options #1-2 of the AEI Housing Center Playbook, respectively. For lot splits, a lot must be at least 10,000 sq.ft. under the 5,000 sq.ft. minimum lot size cap to be eligible for a lot split, and only lot splits of up to three are allowed. All results are the sum of Options #1 and #2 and assume that a public water and sewer system is available. Connecticut's Department of Public Health and Department of Energy and Environment Protection publish geospatial data for land with public water and sewer access (water access data available here, and sewer access data available here).

* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Florida

177K* potential new homes/year +86% annual supply increase 8 bills
View State Playbook
SB 948 Substantial
80K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #1-2
Florida Starter Homes Act. Limits local governments' ability to set minimum lot sizes >1,200 sq.ft. for residential lots connected to public water and sewer. Gives property owners the right to create small lots through administrative lot splits. Approves lot splits, subdivisions, and development permits administratively within shorter timeframes.
Methodology

Results assume that public water and sewer are available. To estimate the share of parcels with both public water and sewer, we take the average of the share of parcels with public water and share with sewer, obtained from the Florida Water Management Inventory Project. In calculating the extra homes per year in new residential subdivisions, we multiply the share of parcels with both public water and sewer by the total homes built in subdivisions in each county. This amounts to about a 30% haircut in the new residential subdivision projections. County population totals use the higher of the 2023 ACS 1-Year or 5-Year survey population estimates. At a minimum lot size of 1,200 sq.ft., we assume a distribution of lot sizes that yields approximately 13.5 homes per acre on average.

HB 1143 Substantial
80K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #1-2
Florida Starter Homes Act (House companion to SB 948). Same provisions limiting minimum lot sizes to 1,200 sq.ft. for lots connected to public water and sewer, with administrative lot splits and expedited permitting.
Methodology

Results assume that public water and sewer are available. To estimate the share of parcels with both public water and sewer, we take the average of the share of parcels with public water and share with sewer, obtained from the Florida Water Management Inventory Project. In calculating the extra homes per year in new residential subdivisions, we multiply the share of parcels with both public water and sewer by the total homes built in subdivisions in each county. This amounts to about a 30% haircut in the new residential subdivision projections. County population totals use the higher of the 2023 ACS 1-Year or 5-Year survey population estimates. At a minimum lot size of 1,200 sq.ft., we assume a distribution of lot sizes that yields approximately 13.5 homes per acre on average.

SB 1342 Moderate
14K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #3
Transit-Oriented Development Act (TOD Act). Requires local governments to establish TOD zones with mixed-use zoning near transit hubs. Allows more FAR and height, less setbacks and parking, within 0.25 miles (Tier 1) and 0.25-0.5 miles (Tier 2) of bus rapid transit and passenger rail stops. Allows single-family, multifamily, commercial, and mixed use by right in TOD zones.
Methodology

Assumes that local governments must establish transit-oriented development (TOD) zones within 1/2 mile of a permanent public transit stop, meaning bus rapid transit, commuter rail, intercity rail, fixed-guideway, or streetcar stops. Thus, data is limited to residential, commercial, and mixed-use zones within 1/2 mile of a permanent public transit stop. Data excludes aerial trams, cable rail, and heavy rail.

SB 048 Weak
4K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #2
Requires local governments to pass ordinances by December 1, 2026, permitting ADUs in all single-family residential areas by right. Restricts local government bans on granny flats and prohibits increased parking requirements. Senate bill lets local governments restrict short-term rentals; House bill doesn't.
Methodology

See the ADU total for Florida state on the AEI Housing Center Light Touch Density Price Chart: https://heat.aeihousingcenter.org/toolkit/ltd_chart.

SB 686 Narrow Applicability
Impact not yet quantified
Playbook Options #1
For 1.5 years, allows property owners to convert agricultural lots to single-family residential lots if surrounded by residential lots.
SB 1548 KISS
KISS
Tweaks Live Local by excluding farms from being 'industrial' or 'commercial' uses for Live Local and allows local government and school board to be used for Live Local projects.
SB 208 KISS
KISS
Limits local governments' application fees for development permits and orders. Requires local governments to set objective compatibility criteria for residential use.
SB 354 KISS
KISS
If a developer owns 10,000+ acres, local governments must create a process to administratively approve development that conserves 60% of land for natural/recreational/utility uses. If 60% conserved, must allow missing middle, workforce, or affordable housing on 20% of land.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Hawaii

8K* potential new homes/year +97% annual supply increase 6 bills
View State Playbook
SB 2423 Substantial
4K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #1-2
Prohibits urban districts in all four Hawaii counties from imposing minimum lot sizes >1,200 sq.ft. Does not apply to land within flood, tsunami, sea level rise, or other hazard areas.
Methodology

Data is limited to Hawaii's urban districts and excludes all land within FEMA designated special flood hazard areas. At a minimum lot size of 1,200 sq.ft., we assume a distribution of lot sizes that yields approximately 13.5 homes per acre on average. For lot splits, a lot must be at least 2,400 sq.ft. to be split under a minimum lot size of 1,200 sq.ft.

HB 1734 Substantial
4K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #1-2
Counties may not set minimum lot sizes >1,200 sq.ft. Applies to all parcels zoned for residential uses within the urban district, except those in flood, tsunami, sea level rise, or other hazard areas.
Methodology

Data is limited to Hawaii's urban districts and excludes all land within FEMA designated special flood hazard areas. At a minimum lot size of 1,200 sq.ft., we assume a distribution of lot sizes that yields approximately 13.5 homes per acre on average. For lot splits, a lot must be at least 2,400 sq.ft. to be split under a minimum lot size of 1,200 sq.ft.

SB 2190 KISS
KISS
Prohibits the imposition of inclusionary zoning requirements on housing reserved in perpetuity for Hawaii residents who are owner-occupants or renters without other real property.
SB 2422 KISS
KISS
Enacts permitting reform for transit-oriented development. Establishes a pro-housing score program to evaluate each county's performance. Allows builder's remedies in TOD areas. Counties must process housing projects in TOD areas ministerially using objective standards.
HB 1739 Narrow Applicability
Impact not yet quantified
Playbook Options #3
Legalizes transit-oriented development. Allows transit-supportive densities in county-designated TOD areas and prohibits counties from restricting such densities. Transit-supportive densities defined as properties with FAR of at least 4, 6, or 7 depending on proximity to rail line.
HB 1719 KISS
KISS
Legalizes manufactured housing by right on any zoning lot where detached dwelling units are allowed under county zoning ordinances and limits regulatory restrictions against manufactured housing.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Idaho

7K* potential new homes/year +62% annual supply increase 1 bills
View State Playbook
SB 1279 Complete
7K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #1
Counties and cities prohibited from requiring minimum lot sizes exceeding 1,000 sq.ft. for lots in starter home subdivisions. Applies to single-family dwellings in new subdivisions on vacant or undeveloped land of at least 4 acres. Local governments must allow density of at least 12 units per acre.
Methodology

Only applies to new residential subdivisions that are 4 acres or larger in size. To determine subdivision sizes, we define a contiguous subdivision as a cluster of 10 to 5,000 new single-family homes built in subdivisions that share the same subdivision name within the same city. Homes in contiguous subdivisions with missing subdivision names are omitted. 99.7% of homes built in subdivisions since 2000 in Idaho had subdivision names. In calculating and applying contiguous subdivision sizes, a 30% allotment is included to account for streets. 76% of new subdivisions built since 2000 in Idaho are at least 4 acres in size. At a minimum lot size of 1,000 sq.ft., we assume a distribution of lot sizes that yields approximately 14 homes per acre on average.

* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Indiana

0* potential new homes/year 1 bills
View State Playbook
HB 1001 KISS
KISS
Speaker's bill. Originally contained binding zoning reform provisions (minimum lot size caps, ADUs by right, residential in commercial zones), but binding zoning provisions were stripped during the legislative process. Retains permitting reforms and building code changes.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Kansas

6K* potential new homes/year +66% annual supply increase 1 bills
View State Playbook
SB 418 Complete
6K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #1-3
Housing omnibus. Single-family, townhomes, and ADUs by-right. Reduces minimum lot sizes to 3,000 sq.ft. for single-family homes under 3,000 sq.ft. living area. Allows single-family homes on all land in cities. Third-party review if local governments take more than 15 days to inspect/review. All land within cities zoned for single-family residential in addition to any other zoning.
Methodology

For Option #1, data excludes homes with a living area greater than or equal to 3,000 sq.ft. and lot size greater than the 90th percentile for small homes with a living area less than 3,000 sq.ft. (about 15,700 sq.ft. lot sizes). This excludes about 10% of homes built in subdivisions from 2000-2024 in Kansas and captures homes that are too large to fit on a 3,000 sq.ft. lot and on lots too large that a builder wouldn't downsize to a 3,000 sq.ft. home. For Option #2, data excludes homes with a living area greater than or equal to 3,000 sq.ft. At a minimum lot size of 3,000 sq.ft., we assume a distribution of lot sizes that yields approximately 11 homes per acre on average.

* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Kentucky

9K* potential new homes/year +49% annual supply increase 6 bills
View State Playbook
HB 617 Complete
7K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #1 & 3
Qualifying planning units shall not require residential lots in qualifying residential developments to be larger than 3,000 sq.ft. Shall not prohibit mixed-use or multifamily in commercial zones. Qualifying planning units include cities with pop >=10,000, combinations of cities with pop >=15,000, counties with pop >=15,000, or combinations with pop >=20,000. Qualifying residential development means a tract >=5 acres in a single-family zone.
Methodology

For Option #1, we include all areas of counties with a population greater than or equal to 20,000. At a minimum lot size of 3,000 sq.ft., we assume a distribution of lot sizes that yields approximately 11 homes per acre on average. For Option #3, as in the Playbook, we include only cities with a population greater than or equal to 10,000. County population totals use the higher of the 2023 ACS 1-Year or 5-Year survey population estimates.

HB 205 Complete
1K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #3
Legalizes residential housing in commercial zones. Multi-unit dwellings and mixed-use developments considered a permitted use in all commercial zones.
Methodology

See the Kentucky state Playbook Option #3 (flexibility to build homes near jobs) total: https://heat.aeihousingcenter.org/toolkit/housing_playbook.

HB 203 Moderate
400 potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #2
Legalizes ADUs by right. Accessory dwelling units considered a permitted use in all residential zones, not subject to permitting or review.
Methodology

See the ADU total for Kentucky state on the AEI Housing Center Light Touch Density Price Chart: https://heat.aeihousingcenter.org/toolkit/ltd_chart.

HB 204 Moderate
240 potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #2
Legalizes missing middle housing in all residential zones. Duplexes permitted by-right in all residential zones (any existing lot may be split into two lots).
Methodology

Assumes any existing lot may be split into two lots. See the total at a maximum number of conversion units per parcel of two for Kentucky state on the AEI Housing Center Light Touch Density Price Chart: https://heat.aeihousingcenter.org/toolkit/ltd_chart.

HB 530 KISS
KISS
Institutes a shot clock, allows third-party reviews, and would allow more housing by-right.
HB 618 KISS
KISS
Building code and permitting reforms. Changes building codes/inspection/permitting for townhomes and 2-, 3-, or 4-unit dwellings to be equivalent to and not more stringent than for single-family homes.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Maryland

32K* potential new homes/year +96% annual supply increase 9 bills
View State Playbook
SB 829 Substantial
7K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #3
Counties must allow multifamily developments or mixed-use developments as a permitted use on any parcel that is served by water and sewer (public or private) and zoned for recreational or commercial use. Limited to counties with a population of at least 150,000.
Methodology

Limits to counties with a population of 150,000 or greater. County population totals use the higher of the 2023 ACS 1-Year or 5-Year survey population estimates.

HB 1137 Substantial
7K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #3
House companion to SB 829. Counties must allow multifamily developments or mixed-use developments as a permitted use on any parcel that is served by water and sewer (public or private) and zoned for recreational or commercial use. Limited to counties with a population of at least 150,000.
Methodology

Limits to counties with a population of 150,000 or greater. County population totals use the higher of the 2023 ACS 1-Year or 5-Year survey population estimates.

HB 239 Moderate
5K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #1-2
Part of the governor's housing package. Prohibits minimum lot sizes >5,000 sq.ft. for single-family homes in areas with public water and sewer. Any existing lot in a single-family zone may be split into at most three lots, subject to the 5,000 sq.ft. cap.
Methodology

For this analysis, the 5,000 sq.ft. cap applies to new residential subdivisions and lot splits, corresponding to Options #1-2 of the AEI Housing Center Playbook, respectively. For lot splits, a lot must be at least 10,000 sq.ft. under the 5,000 sq.ft. minimum lot size cap to be eligible for a lot split. All results are the sum of Options #1 and #2 and assume that a public water and sewer system is available. Maryland does not publish statistics on county-level public water and sewer access. Thus, as a proxy for public water and sewer access, we use tract size and density. Tracts with 95% or more of all homes are on a half-acre or greater and an average density of less than or equal to 1.5 homes per acre are excluded from all calculations.

SB 006 Moderate
5K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #1-2
Part of the governor's housing package. Senate companion to HB 239. Enacts minimum lot size reform.
Methodology

For this analysis, the 5,000 sq.ft. cap applies to new residential subdivisions and lot splits, corresponding to Options #1-2 of the AEI Housing Center Playbook, respectively. For lot splits, a lot must be at least 10,000 sq.ft. under the 5,000 sq.ft. minimum lot size cap to be eligible for a lot split. All results are the sum of Options #1 and #2 and assume that a public water and sewer system is available. Maryland does not publish statistics on county-level public water and sewer access. Thus, as a proxy for public water and sewer access, we use tract size and density. Tracts with 95% or more of all homes are on a half-acre or greater and an average density of less than or equal to 1.5 homes per acre are excluded from all calculations.

HB 778 Moderate
3K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #1-2
Focuses on missing middle housing and introduces a comprehensive plan assessment requirement for counties and local jurisdictions to review and recommend changes to local laws as necessary to authorize housing use on suitable commercial and industrial land. Missing middle housing must be allowed by right on any individual vacant lot that existed before Jan. 2015 and is zoned for single-family detached use.
Methodology

For Option #1, we assume that there is no change in the lot sizes of single-family detached (SFD) homes, but 25% of SFD land is reserved for middle housing (i.e., single-family attached). We limit to subdivisions with at least 20 lots. In Maryland, 72% of new residential subdivisions built from 2000-2024 had at least 20 lots. Thus, the Option #1 projection is adjusted by 72%. For Option #2, we limit viable infill conversion lots to vacant lots that existed before Jan. 2015. All results are the sum of Options #1 and #2 and assume that a public water and sewer system is available. Maryland does not publish statistics on county-level public water and sewer access. Thus, as a proxy for public water and sewer access, we use tract size and density. Tracts with 95% or more of all homes are on a half-acre or greater and an average density of less than or equal to 1.5 homes per acre are excluded from all calculations.

SB 389 Moderate
3K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #3
Part of the governor's housing package. Facilitates transit-oriented development. Allows mixed-use development on land designated for commercial use within 1/2 mile of a rail transit station receiving at least hourly service on average from 8 AM to 6 PM, Monday through Friday.
Methodology

About 40% of properties in Maryland's commercial zones are 1/2 mile from major public transit. Thus, this projection is 40% of the Maryland state Playbook Option #3 total (7,300 * 0.4 = 2,920).

HB 1538 Weak
560 potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #2
Requires Maryland localities to permit at least one internal accessory dwelling unit and one external accessory dwelling unit per single-family lot, limits local and utility fees, and exempts family-occupied ADUs from property tax.
Methodology

See the ADU total for Maryland state on the AEI Housing Center Light Touch Density Price Chart: https://heat.aeihousingcenter.org/toolkit/ltd_chart.

HB 548 KISS
KISS
Part of the governor's housing package. Implements permitting reform, with the most significant feature being making Maryland an early-vesting state.
SB 325 KISS
KISS
Part of the governor's housing package. Implements permitting reform, with the most significant feature being making Maryland an early-vesting state. Senate companion.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Massachusetts

11K* potential new homes/year +62% annual supply increase 1 bills
View State Playbook
S.2836 Moderate
11K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #1-3
Eliminates minimum lot sizes for all new residential developments statewide. Newly created subdivision lots must not exceed 10,000 sq.ft. Allows up to 5 dwelling units by right on lots connected to water and sewer, up to 3 on lots without. ADUs permitted by-right. Mixed-use or multifamily must be permitted within 1/2 mile of commuter rail, subway, ferry terminal, or bus station at minimum density of 15 units/acre.
Methodology

For this analysis, the 10,000 sq.ft. cap applies only to new residential subdivisions, corresponding to Option #1 of the Playbook. For lot splits, up to 5 are allowed on land with public water and sewer access, and up to 3 are allowed on land without water and sewer access. ADUs are assumed to a by-right use on all land regardless of water/sewer access. The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection publishes water and sewer utility service boundaries. We mapped homes in our property-level data to these boundaries for the Option #2 analysis.

* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Michigan

8K* potential new homes/year +35% annual supply increase 1 bills
View State Playbook
8K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #1-2
Proposed package would permit duplexes by-right in single-family residential zones within or adjacent to MSAs. Caps parking at 1 space per unit. Defines setback requirements. Caps minimum dwelling size at 500 sq.ft. Caps lot sizes at 1,500 sq.ft. for single-family homes in metro areas. Allows ADUs by right. Creates fair standards for development review studies.
Methodology

For Option #1, data is limited to properties with public water and sewer access. Michigan does not publish data on public water and sewer access; thus, as a proxy for public water and sewer access, we use tract size and density. Tracts with 95% or more of all homes are on a half-acre or greater and an average density of less than or equal to 1.5 homes per acre are excluded from all calculations. At a minimum lot size of 1,500 sq.ft., we assume a distribution of lot sizes that yields 13 homes per acre on average.

* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Minnesota

10K* potential new homes/year +50% annual supply increase 1 bills
View State Playbook
10K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #1-3
Minnesota is working on a bill that uses recommendations from the AEI Housing Center Playbook. Specific bill details not disclosed.
Methodology

Specific bill details not to be disclosed. See AEI Housing Center Playbook methodology for general methodological notes: https://www.aei.org/strong-foundations-a-playbook-for-housing-and-economic-growth-methodology/.

* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Missouri

2K* potential new homes/year +7% annual supply increase 4 bills
View State Playbook
HB 2991 Substantial
2K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #3
Mandates that localities of a certain size must allow residential housing in commercial zones. Counties must allow mixed-use residential and multifamily development by-right in areas zoned for office, commercial, retail, warehouse, or mixed-use (excludes heavy industrial). Limits to counties with population >700,000.
Methodology

County population totals use the higher of the 2023 ACS 1-Year or 5-Year survey population estimates. Data is limited to counties with a population greater than 700,000.

HB 1791 KISS
KISS
Creates a shot clock for permitting.
HB 1796 KISS
KISS
Promotes property rights protections by limiting local governments' ability to mandate green building codes and reforming permitting.
HB 1851 KISS
KISS
Building Permit Reform Act. Proposes a variety of permitting reforms.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Nebraska

300* potential new homes/year +4% annual supply increase 4 bills
View State Playbook
LB 1041 Substantial
300 potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #2
Legalizes ADUs by right. Cities and counties must allow a minimum of one ADU on the same lot as any single-family residence, attached or detached. ADU must not exceed 1,000 sq.ft. or 50% of the size of the single-family residence, whichever is larger.
Methodology

See the ADU total for Nebraska state on the AEI Housing Center Light Touch Density Price Chart: https://heat.aeihousingcenter.org/toolkit/ltd_chart.

LB 1094 KISS
KISS
Mandates automatic approval for code-compliant housing developments (single-family, ADUs, multifamily) without discretionary review. Establishes a shot clock.
LB 441 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Enacts permitting reform by allowing virtual inspections for certain permits.
LB 861 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Enhances transparency in permitting by requiring inspection records for permitted building projects to be publicly accessible.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

New Mexico

6K* potential new homes/year +81% annual supply increase 4 bills
View State Playbook
SB 131 Complete
3K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #2-3
Legalizes residential housing in commercial zones. Allows one additional dwelling unit per lot in single-family zoning districts. Cannot prohibit duplexes and townhouses in residential zones or on mixed-use lots. Cannot prohibit residential apartments in commercial zones.
Methodology

This bill allows ADUs, duplexes, and townhomes in residential zones and residential in commercial with no restrictions. Since it doesn't specify a minimum lot size, we defaulted to our Playbook projection for Options #2 and 3 for New Mexico state. See the New Mexico Playbook here: https://heat.aeihousingcenter.org/toolkit/housing_playbook.

HB 138 Substantial
3K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #1-2
Minimum lot size reform. Counties and municipalities may not impose minimum lot sizes in residential zones. Applies statewide.
Methodology

This bill stipulates that counties cannot establish minimum lot sizes. Therefore, we defaulted to our Playbook projections for Options #1 and 3 for New Mexico state, excluding ADUs. See the New Mexico Playbook here: https://heat.aeihousingcenter.org/toolkit/housing_playbook.

HB 17 Weak
430 potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #2-3
Legalizes ADUs by right and allows multifamily housing in commercial districts and areas near transit. Zoning authorities must allow at least one ADU per lot in all residential districts. Must allow multifamily (including duplexes and townhomes) in all residential and commercial zoning districts and areas within 1/4 mile of a major public transit location. Major public transit means passenger rail, fixed-route service every 15 minutes, or DOT park-and-ride locations.
Methodology

This bill contains drafting ambiguities that impact the projection. We assume that multifamily housing (including duplexes and townhomes) in both residential and commercial zones must be within 1/4 mile of a major public transit stop. We interpret the bill's allowable minimum density of 10 units per acre for multifamily as implying a minimum lot size of no greater than 4,356 sq.ft. About 10% of properties in Nebraska's commercial zones are 1/4 mile from major public transit. Thus, the Option #3 projection is 10% of the Nebraska state Playbook Option #3 total (150 * 0.1 = 150).

HB 110 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Increases transparency in the permitting process by mandating the collection of data on permitting.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

North Carolina

26K* potential new homes/year +41% annual supply increase 6 bills
View State Playbook
SB 499 Complete
14K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #3
Permits residential development in all commercial zones statewide.
Methodology

See Option #3 total for North Carolina state Playbook here: https://heat.aeihousingcenter.org/toolkit/housing_playbook.

10K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #1-2
For municipalities with a population above 50,000 in counties with a population above 275,000, allow minimum lot sizes of 1,200 sq.ft. in new residential subdivisions that are 2 acres or larger. Permit lot splits of up to 10 per existing lot.
Methodology

All estimates are limited to municipalities with a population above 50,000 in counties with a population above 275,000. North Carolina does not publish recent data on public water and sewer access. Thus, as a proxy for public water and sewer access, we use tract size and density. Tracts with 95% or more of all homes are on a half-acre or greater and an average density of less than or equal to 1.5 homes per acre are excluded from all calculations. At a minimum lot size of 1,200 sq.ft., we assume a distribution of lot sizes that yields 13.5 homes per acre on average. For Option #2, we assume lot splits up to 10 are permitted if each lot meets the 1,200 sq.ft. minimum lot size.

SB 495 Moderate
2K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #2
Local governments must allow at least one ADU per single-family detached dwelling in all residential zones that permit single-family detached homes.
Methodology

See the ADU total for North Carolina state on the AEI Housing Center Light Touch Density Price Chart: https://heat.aeihousingcenter.org/toolkit/ltd_chart.

HB 369 KISS
KISS
Eliminates parking mandates. Passed the House last session; unclear whether it will move in the Senate.
SB 492 KISS
KISS
Permits small apartment buildings to have a single staircase.
KISS
Streamline approvals and inspections with third-party professionals.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Rhode Island

2K* potential new homes/year +113% annual supply increase 1 bills
View State Playbook
SB 2265 Moderate
2K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #1-3
Municipalities with pop >40,000 must allow residential development in at least 30% of commercial zoning districts. Statewide minimum lot sizes: 2,500 sq.ft. for lots with public water/sewer within 1/4 mile of transit; 5,000 sq.ft. for lots with public water/sewer; 1 acre for all other lots.
Methodology

Data on public water and sewer access are obtained from the Rhode Island Geographic Information System Water Supply Districts and Sewered Areas. For minimum lot sizes of 2,500 and 5,000 sq.ft., we assume a distribution of lot sizes that yields 11.5 and 8 homes per acre on average. For Option #3, data is limited to municipalities with a population greater than 40,000. To account for the requirement that municipalities provide a minimum of 30% of land in commercial areas for residential overlays, we multiply each eligible municipality's Option #3 total by 30%.

* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Utah

0* potential new homes/year 1 bills
View State Playbook
HB 184 Case-by-Case Denial with Local Discretion
Playbook Options #1-2
Streamlines building starter homes by allowing property owners to request exceptions to local zoning for smaller lots and homes with expedited review and limited denial grounds. Designates smaller lots and starter homes as preferred land uses. Property owners may request minimum lot size of 5,400 sq.ft. in lieu of larger local requirements. Localities retain case-by-case denial ability.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Virginia

13K* potential new homes/year +33% annual supply increase 12 bills
View State Playbook
HB 816 Substantial
7K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #3
Legalizes residential housing in commercial zones. Zoning ordinances must allow by-right multifamily and mixed-use on at least 75% of commercial/business zoning land. Includes affordable housing incentive: developments dedicating >=10% units to affordable housing may receive fee waivers/reductions and expedited processing.
Methodology

This bill permits residential in commercial on 75% of commercial land. Thus, we calculated the impact as 75% of the Virginia state Playbook Option #3 total (9,300 * 0.75 = 6,975). See the Virginia Playbook here: https://heat.aeihousingcenter.org/toolkit/housing_playbook.

SB 454 Moderate
3K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #3
Legalizes residential housing in commercial zones. Zoning ordinances must permit multifamily and mixed-use residential by-right on at least 75% of commercial zoning land. Applies only to cities with pop >20,000 or parcels within designated metropolitan planning areas.
Methodology

Data is limited to cities with a population above 20,000 or parcels within a designated metropolitan planning area. The Option #3 total is then adjusted downward by 25%, reflecting the bill's permitting residential in commercial on 75% of commercial land.

HB 611 Weak
1K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #2
Legalizes ADUs by right. Zoning ordinances for single-family residential zoning districts must include ADUs as a permitted use.
Methodology

See the ADU total for Virginia state on the AEI Housing Center Light Touch Density Price Chart: https://heat.aeihousingcenter.org/toolkit/ltd_chart.

SB 531 Weak
1K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #2
Legalizes ADUs by right. Zoning ordinances for single-family residential districts shall include ADUs as a permitted use. Localities may require parking, proximity to primary dwelling, no separate sale from primary dwelling, etc.
Methodology

See the ADU total for Virginia state on the AEI Housing Center Light Touch Density Price Chart: https://heat.aeihousingcenter.org/toolkit/ltd_chart.

HB 262 KISS
KISS
Limits parking mandates.
HB 888 KISS
KISS
Limits parking mandates.
SB 354 KISS
KISS
Limits parking mandates.
HB 1212 Narrow Applicability and Local Discretion
Playbook Options #1-2
Reforms minimum lot sizes. Localities with pop >=20,000 must maintain at least one zoning district with minimum lot sizes no larger than 3,000 sq.ft. Localities have discretion to choose where the small-lot district is located. If a locality already has a qualifying district, they are exempt.
HB 418 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Legalizes manufactured housing in residential zones.
HB 447 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Enhances standing requirements for suing local land use decisions.
HB 655 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Legalizes manufactured housing in residential zones.
SB 346 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Legalizes manufactured housing in residential zones.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Washington

74K* potential new homes/year +97% annual supply increase 7 bills
View State Playbook
SB 6026 Substantial
37K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #3
Any city or county required or choosing to plan under the Growth Management Act with a population of 30,000+ is prohibited from excluding residential uses in areas zoned for commercial or mixed-use development.
Methodology

Data is limited to counties that are required to fully plan under Washington's Growth Management Act with a population of 30,000 or greater. County population totals use the higher of the 2023 ACS 1-Year or 5-Year survey population estimates.

HB 2480 Substantial
37K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #3
House companion to SB 6026. Any city or county required or choosing to plan under the Growth Management Act with a population of 30,000+ is prohibited from excluding residential uses in areas zoned for commercial or mixed-use development.
Methodology

Data is limited to counties that are required to fully plan under Washington's Growth Management Act with a population of 30,000 or greater. County population totals use the higher of the 2023 ACS 1-Year or 5-Year survey population estimates.

SB 5633 KISS
KISS
Reforms the permitting process including implementing a shot clock and limiting hearings for subdivision applications.
HB 1859 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Enables religious organizations to provide housing on their land.
HB 2228 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Establishes a technical advisory group to recommend updates to Washington's building code on scissor stairs in multi-unit permanent residences.
SB 5885 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Enables religious organizations to provide housing on their land.
SB 6001 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Establishes a technical advisory group to recommend updates to Washington's building code on scissor stairs in multi-unit permanent residences.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

West Virginia

40* potential new homes/year +1% annual supply increase 4 bills
View State Playbook
HB 4711 Moderate
30 potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #2
Legalizes ADUs by right. Municipalities must adopt regulations allowing a minimum of one ADU by-right on any lot containing a single-family dwelling. Only applies to municipalities (incorporated areas), not unincorporated county land.
Methodology

Data is limited to municipalities only (i.e., incorporated cities, towns, or consolidated city-counties). Unincorporated county land is excluded from the total.

HB 4732 Weak
10 potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #2
Legalizes ADUs by right. Municipalities must allow a minimum of one ADU by-right on any lot containing a single-family dwelling in at least 35% of lots zoned for residential use.
Methodology

Data is limited to municipalities only (i.e., incorporated cities, towns, or consolidated city-counties). Unincorporated county land is excluded from the total. The Option #2 ADU total is then adjusted downward by 65%, as ADUs are a permitted use on only 35% of residential land under this bill.

HB 4702 KISS
KISS
Reforms minimum lot sizes for ADUs. Zoning ordinances may not require a minimum lot size for parcels with ADUs larger than the minimum for other single-family dwellings or townhouses in the same zoning district.
HB 4731 KISS
KISS
Substantial legislation legalizing multifamily housing and ADUs by right, streamlining permitting, and establishing judicial appeal process for denied permits with de novo review. Process reform that removes discretionary review for code-compliant housing but does not change local codes.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Wyoming

0* potential new homes/year 2 bills
View State Playbook
HB 2 KISS
KISS
Establishes a shot clock for permitting.
HB 77 KISS
KISS
Repeals the state's protest petition.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

New Hampshire

0* potential new homes/year 2 bills
View State Playbook
HB 1357 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Allows manufactured homes in any residentially zoned area and prohibits discriminatory zoning restrictions against them.
SB 435 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Makes it easier for property owners to obtain a variance.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

All Housing Bills

Click column headers to sort. Use the search box to filter.

About this Tracker

This tracker monitors state-level legislation that could increase housing supply by reforming local zoning regulations. The bills tracked here align with the AEI Housing Center’s State Playbook, a comprehensive guide for state legislators to unlock housing production through targeted reforms.

What is “Annual Supply Increase”?

The annual supply increase percentage compares projected new homes from proposed legislation to the average number of homes built per year in each state from 2010-2023 (according to American Community Survey data). For example, +107% means the legislation could more than double the state’s typical annual housing production.

What are Playbook Options #1, #2, and #3?

The AEI Housing Center Playbook identifies three state-level options to unlock new housing supply using small lots:

KISS (Keep It Short and Simple) reforms eliminate unnecessary complexity in the homebuilding process. These include:

Playbook Alignment Ratings

Each bill is rated on how closely it aligns with the Playbook’s recommended provisions, measured as a percentage of the Playbook option’s projected homes:

* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. “Poison pills” such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. Projections assume that bills with similar reforms are independent from one another. See the playbook for more detail.

Read the full methodology and report