AEI State Housing Supply Legislative Tracker

State Housing Supply
Legislative Tracker
251,000*
potential new homes per year
“Small Lots, Small Lots, Small Lots”
44 states with legislation
316 housing bills tracked
Updated September 2026 (changelog)

📄 PDF Report

2026 Scorecard
States
14 Aligned 7 Enacted 6 Pending 20 Failed 24 KISS
Bills
21 Aligned 9 Enacted 11 Pending 52 Failed 106 KISS


Summary of introduced bills from 14 states having total or partial alignment with AEI Housing Center Playbook Options 1-3. Total projected extra homes per year: 251,000 (assuming KISS followed and no poison pills).

Right most column shows the bill’s percentage Playbook alignment with one or more options: Complete: ≥100%, Substantial: 51%-99%, Moderate: 15-50%, and Weak: <15%. = bill passed.


States with Housing Legislation

Ranked by annual supply increase. Click a state for details.

1
Illinois
Top Impact
41K*
potential new homes/year
+163% annual supply increase
2
Washington
Top Impact
41K*
potential new homes/year
+107% annual supply increase
3
California
Top Impact
96K*
potential new homes/year
+105% annual supply increase
4
Michigan
Top Impact
16K*
potential new homes/year
+73% annual supply increase
5
Kansas
Top Impact
5K*
potential new homes/year
+50% annual supply increase
6
Idaho
5K*
potential new homes/year
+45% annual supply increase
7
New Jersey
8K*
potential new homes/year
+38% annual supply increase
8
Virginia
12K*
potential new homes/year
+35% annual supply increase
9
Ohio
8K*
potential new homes/year
+29% annual supply increase
10
Pennsylvania
8K*
potential new homes/year
+26% annual supply increase
11
Maine
1K*
potential new homes/year
+24% annual supply increase
12
Maryland
3K*
potential new homes/year
+15% annual supply increase
13
North Carolina
6K*
potential new homes/year
+9% annual supply increase
14
Massachusetts
2K*
potential new homes/year
+9% annual supply increase
15
Alabama
0*
potential new homes/year
16
Colorado
0*
potential new homes/year
17
Delaware
0*
potential new homes/year
18
Florida
0*
potential new homes/year
19
Georgia
0*
potential new homes/year
20
Indiana
0*
potential new homes/year
21
Iowa
0*
potential new homes/year
22
Louisiana
0*
potential new homes/year
23
Minnesota
0*
potential new homes/year
24
Nebraska
0*
potential new homes/year
25
New York
0*
potential new homes/year
26
Oklahoma
0*
potential new homes/year
27
Oregon
0*
potential new homes/year
28
Rhode Island
0*
potential new homes/year
29
South Carolina
0*
potential new homes/year
30
South Dakota
0*
potential new homes/year
31
Tennessee
0*
potential new homes/year
32
Vermont
0*
potential new homes/year
33
Wisconsin
0*
potential new homes/year
34
Wyoming
0*
potential new homes/year

Alabama

0* potential new homes/year 4 bills
View State Playbook
✓ Enacted HB 315 KISS
KISS
A local act authorizing the governing body of Class 1 municipalities to enact and enforce a vacant property registration ordinance. Creates a citywide database of vacant residential and commercial buildings, requiring owners of vacant properties to register. It is a blight-abatement and code-compliance measure aimed at monitoring and reducing vacancy.
✓ Enacted HB 404 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Authorizes Class 1 municipalities to create one or more nonprofit community land trusts by ordinance to provide affordable housing for low- and moderate-income families.
✓ Enacted HB 510 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Expands the powers of industrial development boards, authorizing them to issue and sell bonds and to finance, construct, acquire, lease, operate, and dispose of "development projects" — a broad category that can include residential uses such as homes, apartments, townhouses, condominiums, and hotels — for the public purpose of promoting trade, commerce, industry, and employment.
✓ Enacted SB 282 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Amends Alabama law to authorize the Alabama Department of Revenue to issue certificates of title to current owners of manufactured homes designated model year 1999 and earlier (homes previously barred from titling) when requested by the owner.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Arizona

0* potential new homes/year 0 bills
View State Playbook
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

California

96K* potential new homes/year +105% annual supply increase 5 bills
View State Playbook
✓ Passed AB 956 Moderate
96K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #2 (ADU only)
Expands California's ADU framework by requiring local governments to ministerially approve up to two detached ADUs on a lot with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling. Allows these units to be combined with a junior ADU within the primary dwelling, enabling up to three accessory dwelling units on some single-family parcels.
Methodology

Assumes ADUs are built on land up to a 100% land share.

✓ Passed SB 1014 KISS
KISS
Requires local governments to disclose all required onsite and offsite infrastructure improvements and their estimated costs within 30 days of receiving a housing development application. Prohibits agencies from requiring improvements during the post-entitlement permit stage if those requirements were not previously disclosed.
✓ Passed SB 1116 NA
Playbook Options #2
Localities must "ministerially consider" lot splits that will result in 10 or fewer parcels. Lots eligible for subdivision must be one of the following: (1) Zoned to allow multifamily residential dwelling use and less than 5 acres large, or (2) Vacant and zoned for single-family residential development and less than one and a half acres large. Lots must be located within an incorporated city whose boundaries include some portion of an urbanized area, or within an urbanized area or urban cluster in a county with a population greater than 600,000 based on the most recent U.S. Census Bureau data.
✓ Passed SB 1117 KISS
KISS
Reduces development fees for mid-sized accessory dwelling units by modifying how local governments calculate impact fees.
✓ Passed SB 908 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Gutted and amended. The bill is now titled "relating to windows" and operates on Civil Code section 4754 and Government Code section 65850.73. The transit-oriented development intent language that placed this bill on the tracker is gone.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Colorado

0* potential new homes/year 1 bills
View State Playbook
✓ Enacted HB26-1001 (HOME Act) Narrow Applicability
Impact not yet quantified
Playbook Options #3
Requires subject jurisdictions (local governments with populations greater than 2,000) to allow multifamily housing to be constructed on a qualifying property that does not contain an exempt parcel. A "qualifying property" must be 5 acres or less and owned by: an affordable housing nonprofit, a public transit nonprofit, a school district, a state college or university, a housing authority, or a local/regional transit district.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Connecticut

0* potential new homes/year 0 bills
View State Playbook
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Delaware

0* potential new homes/year 2 bills
View State Playbook
✓ Enacted HS 1 for HB 450 Narrow Applicability
Impact not yet quantified
Playbook Options #1
A permitting-acceleration and transportation-impact-fee reform. Requires that, when a county sets a residential density requirement in a growth area, the ordinance must allow a minimum density of at least 4 dwelling units per acre and must permit multifamily housing types ("townhomes, apartments, and stacked flats").
✓ Enacted SS 2 for SB 23 Narrow Applicability
Impact not yet quantified
Playbook Options #1-3
Requires every Delaware local jurisdiction over 2,000 population to adopt a state-reviewed affordable housing plan as part of its comprehensive plan, setting a strategic goal that 20% of housing units be affordable. The plan must include a defined set of zoning-reform elements, including increases in permitted residential density, authorization of a mix of housing types (duplexes, triplexes, ADUs, multifamily, manufactured and cottage housing) without conditional-use permits, and by-right administrative review of conforming residential applications. For local jurisdictions with a population greater than 10,000, the affordable housing plan must create transit-oriented development zoning designations. The bill does not specify exact zoning reform elements that jurisdictions must enact in their plans.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Florida

0* potential new homes/year 4 bills
View State Playbook
✓ Enacted HB 1389 KISS
KISS
Tweaks Live Local by excluding farms from being "industrial" or "commercial" uses for Live Local purposes and allows local government and school board land to be used for Live Local projects.
✓ Enacted HB 399 KISS
KISS
Limits local governments' application fees for development permits and orders. Requires local governments to set objective compatibility criteria for residential use.
✓ Enacted HB 691 Narrow Applicability
Impact not yet quantified
Playbook Options #1
For 1.5 years, allows property owners to convert agricultural lots to single-family residential lots if surrounded by residential lots. Speeds up the application process for landowners to get an "agricultural enclave" designation, opening the door for development at the same density as adjacent parcels. Provisions expire January 1, 2028, unless extended by the Legislature. Applies only in counties with populations of 1.75 million or less.
✓ Enacted SB 686 Narrow Applicability
Impact not yet quantified
Playbook Options #1
For 1.5 years, allows property owners to convert agricultural lots to single-family residential lots if surrounded by residential lots. Speeds up the application process for landowners to get an "agricultural enclave" designation, opening the door for development at the same density as adjacent parcels. Provisions expire January 1, 2028, unless extended by the Legislature. Applies only in counties with populations of 1.75 million or less.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Georgia

0* potential new homes/year 1 bills
View State Playbook
✓ Enacted SB 447 KISS
KISS
A permitting- and inspection-streamlining bill. Requires local governing authorities to accept private professional providers' approved building/plumbing/electrical inspection reports — deemed approved "as a matter of law" unless the authority identifies specific deficiencies in writing within two business days — and bars deficiencies from delaying approved work.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Hawaii

0* potential new homes/year 0 bills
View State Playbook
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Idaho

5K* potential new homes/year +45% annual supply increase 4 bills
View State Playbook
✓ Enacted SB 1352 Complete
5K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #1
Cities cannot require minimum lot sizes exceeding 1,500 sq.ft. for single-family detached dwellings in starter home subdivisions. Applies to cities with a population greater than 10,000.
Methodology

Only applies to new residential subdivisions that are 4 acres or larger in size. 76% of new subdivisions built since 2000 in Idaho are at least 4 acres in size. At a minimum lot size of 1,500 sq.ft., approximately 13 homes per acre on average are assumed. Data is limited to cities with a population of at least 10,000.

✓ Enacted SB 1354 Weak
260 potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #2 (ADU only)
Establishes a statewide framework requiring cities with populations above 5,000 to allow accessory dwelling units in residential zones. The bill mandates that cities permit both internal and detached ADUs, prohibits parking requirements and owner-occupancy mandates, and limits local restrictions on ADU size, setbacks, height, and fees. ADUs must be approved administratively and cannot be subject to discretionary review. The legislation also prevents homeowners' associations from banning ADUs.
Methodology

Data is limited to cities with a population of at least 5,000. City population totals use the higher of the 2023 ACS 1-Year or 5-Year survey population estimates. Assumes ADUs are built on land up to a 100% land share.

✓ Enacted HB 706 KISS
KISS
Local governments may allow residential group R-2 apartment buildings to be served by one single stairway.
✓ Enacted HB 800 KISS
KISS
Legalizes manufactured housing in single-family zoned areas.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Illinois

41K* potential new homes/year +163% annual supply increase 3 bills
View State Playbook
SB 4060 Substantial
27K potential new homes/year
Option #1: 8K · Option #2: 19K
Playbook Options #1-2
Legalizes middle housing statewide in any residential zone that permits single-family homes. The bill caps minimum lot sizes at 2,500 sq.ft. and requires cities to allow 4–8 units on typical residential lots depending on size, with approvals processed ministerially.
Methodology

At a minimum lot size of 2,500 sq.ft., approximately 11.5 homes per acre on average are assumed. Lots eligible for conversion must be between 2,501 and 5,000 sq.ft. to be split into four lots, 5,001 and 7,500 sq.ft. to be split into six lots, and > 7,500 sq.ft. to be split into 8 lots.

SB 3726 Weak
14K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #2 (ADU only)
Municipalities may not prohibit the building of accessory dwelling units. This is a statewide mandate with no population threshold, geographic limitations, or opt-out provisions.
Methodology

Assumes ADUs are built on land up to a 100% land share.

HB 5083 KISS
KISS
Allows for by-right developments of multifamily and mixed-use projects up to four stories on land owned by churches and other faith-based organizations.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Indiana

0* potential new homes/year 1 bills
View State Playbook
✓ Enacted HB 1001 KISS
KISS
*Original bill background:* HB 1001, the Speaker's bill, was a substantial piece of pro-housing legislation. Among many items, the legislation would have capped minimum lot sizes, allowed up to three townhomes on most lots, legalized ADUs by right, capped parking mandates at 1 space per unit, legalized residential housing in commercial zones by right, and enacted building code reforms. Original projected impact: 24,600 homes/year. *What survived in the enrolled act:* Fee reform, building permit shot clock enforcement, building code cost reductions, and annual housing reporting requirements. A procedural requirement for localities to hold a public hearing by January 1, 2027, to review their unified development ordinance with the goal of increasing housing development was added. *What was removed:* All binding zoning provisions aligned with Playbook Options #1–3, including lot size caps, duplexes/ADUs permitted by-right, and residential in commercial zones.
Methodology

For Option #1, data is limited to tracts that are 5 acres or larger. We assume that a minimum lot size of 1,400 sq.ft. will largely apply in new subdivisions. For Option #2, a minimum lot size of 1,500 sq.ft. for duplexes is assumed. HB 1001 allows counties to opt out of certain provisions. The actual impact may be lower than projected. Updated projected impact after amendments: 0 homes/year from Playbook alignment.

* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Iowa

0* potential new homes/year 1 bills
View State Playbook
✓ Enacted SF 2472 KISS
KISS
A property tax reform bill that caps annual property tax revenue growth for cities and counties at 2%, expands the homestead exemption, phases out homestead/business replacement credits, and establishes a first-time homebuyer program.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Kansas

5K* potential new homes/year +50% annual supply increase 1 bills
View State Playbook
✓ Enacted SB 418 Substantial
5K potential new homes/year
Option #1: 4K · Option #2: 900
Playbook Options #1-2
The enrolled version of the bill mandates that all cities and counties allow a minimum lot size of 3,000 sq.ft. for new single-family residences that are less than 2,500 sq.ft. of total livable floor area. Streamlines the approval process for by-right housing developments, which include single-family homes, townhouses, and ADUs. Note: The original bill applied to homes under 3,000 sq.ft. floor area; the enrolled version lowered this threshold to 2,500 sq.ft. Original projected impact was 5,100 homes/year; the enrolled version yields 4,900 homes/year.
Methodology

For Option #1, data excludes homes with living area ≥ 3,000 sq.ft. and lot sizes > the 90th percentile (~15,700 sq.ft.). For Option #2, data excludes homes with living area ≥ 3,000 sq.ft. At a minimum lot size of 3,000 sq.ft., approximately 11 homes per acre on average are assumed.

* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Kentucky

0* potential new homes/year 0 bills
View State Playbook
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Louisiana

0* potential new homes/year 2 bills
View State Playbook
✓ Enacted HB 468 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Regulates the wholesaling of residential real property (one-to-four-unit dwellings). It defines "wholesaler" and "wholesaling", requires wholesalers to give sellers written disclosures before signing, grants sellers a five-day right to cancel and a mandatory cancellation-notice form, restricts wholesaler conduct, and more.
✓ Enacted SB 398 KISS
KISS
Recodifies and modernizes the state's regulatory framework for factory-built (manufactured and modular) housing. Expands the Residential Contractors Subcommittee from five to nine members and enacts a "Uniform Standards Code for Manufactured and Factory-Built Housing".
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Maine

1K* potential new homes/year +24% annual supply increase 4 bills
View State Playbook
✓ Enacted LD 2173 Complete
1K potential new homes/year
Option #1: 810 · Option #2: 410
Playbook Options #1-2
LD 2173 is the third bill amending Maine's statewide zoning reforms (following LD 2003 in 2022 and LD 1829 in 2025). It clarifies provisions in the previous bills in response to input from municipalities, specifically raising the original lot size minimum outside of growth areas from 5,000 sq.ft. to 10,000 sq.ft. - Within designated growth areas served by water and sewer, municipalities may not require minimum lot sizes greater than 5,000 sq.ft. or density limits stricter than 1,250 sq.ft. of lot area per unit for the first four units. - Outside growth areas but with water/sewer, municipalities may not require more than 5,000 sq.ft. per dwelling unit for the first unit or 10,000 sq.ft. for two units in a structure. - Up to four units per lot are permitted in designated growth areas or where water/sewer exists. Up to three units per lot are permitted statewide where residential uses are allowed. - At least one accessory dwelling unit must be allowed on any lot where the principal structure is a single-family dwelling or 2–3-unit structure.
Methodology

Growth area designations are made at the municipal level through each town's comprehensive plan; as a proxy for growth areas, Census urban land designations are used. As a proxy for public water and sewer access, tract size and density are used. Tracts with 95%+ of all homes on a half-acre or greater and average density ≤ 1.5 homes/acre are excluded. At minimum lot sizes of 5,000 sq.ft. and 1,250 sq.ft., approximately 10 and 13.5 homes per acre on average are assumed.

✓ Enacted LD 128 KISS
KISS
Modifies Maine's Site Location of Development Law to treat detached residential housing accommodating up to four families — including accessory dwelling units — similarly to single-family homes for purposes of environmental review thresholds. Raises the subdivision threshold requiring state review from 5 lots to 15 lots for certain residential developments and increases the acreage threshold from 20 to 30 acres.
✓ Enacted LD 1375 KISS
KISS
Directs the Department of Economic and Community Development's Housing Opportunity Program to convene a working group to identify regulatory barriers to housing construction and propose legislative solutions.
✓ Enacted LD 161 KISS
KISS
Directs the Maine Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry to convene a stakeholder group to review and recommend modernization of the state's subdivision laws.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Maryland

3K* potential new homes/year +15% annual supply increase 5 bills
View State Playbook
✓ Enacted HB 894 Moderate
3K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #3
Allows mixed-use development on land designated for commercial use that is within ½ mile of a rail transit station that receives at least hourly service on average from 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM, Monday through Friday.
Methodology

About 40% of properties in Maryland's commercial zones are within ½ mile of major public transit. This projection is 40% of the Maryland state Playbook Option #3 total (7,300 × 0.4 = 2,920).

✓ Enacted HB 1137 KISS
KISS
*Original bill:* Counties must allow multifamily developments or mixed-use developments as a permitted use on any parcel that is served by water and sewer (public or private) and zoned for recreational or commercial use. Limited to counties with a population of at least 150,000. *As amended and passed:* The bill was narrowed to require the Maryland Department of Housing and Community Development to study the residential-in-commercial-zone laws and report back by December 1, 2026. All provisions from the original bill that aligned with the Playbook were removed. Projected impact reduced from 7,100 to zero extra homes per year.
Methodology

Limits to counties with a population of 150,000 or greater. County population totals use the higher of the 2023 ACS 1-Year or 5-Year survey population estimates.

✓ Enacted HB 548 KISS
KISS
Implements permitting reform, with the most significant feature being making Maryland an early-vesting state. Part of the Governor's housing package.
✓ Enacted SB 325 KISS
KISS
Implements permitting reform, with the most significant feature being making Maryland an early-vesting state. Part of the Governor's housing package.
✓ Enacted SB 829 KISS
KISS
*Original bill:* Counties must allow multifamily developments or mixed-use developments as a permitted use on any parcel that is served by water and sewer (public or private) and zoned for recreational or commercial use. Limited to counties with a population of at least 150,000. *As amended and passed:* The bill was narrowed to require the Maryland Department of Housing and Community Development to study the residential-in-commercial-zone laws and report back by December 1, 2026. All provisions from the original bill that aligned with the Playbook were removed. Projected impact reduced from 7,100 to zero extra homes per year.
Methodology

Limits to counties with a population of 150,000 or greater. County population totals use the higher of the 2023 ACS 1-Year or 5-Year survey population estimates.

* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Massachusetts

2K* potential new homes/year +9% annual supply increase 1 bills
View State Playbook
Question 7 Moderate
2K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #1
Massachusetts voters will decide on November 3, 2026 whether to bar municipalities from prohibiting, unreasonably restricting, or requiring a special permit for single-family homes on lots of at least 5,000 square feet with at least 50 feet of frontage, in any zoning district that allows residential uses and where the lot has access to both public water and public sewer. Municipalities would keep control of setbacks, building bulk and height, and short-term rentals. Question 7 reached the ballot by citizen initiative petition after 89,216 signatures were certified in January 2026. It does not authorize accessory dwelling units, multifamily housing, or lot splits, and it does not create residential development rights in commercial zones.
Methodology

Option #1 only. Ballot Question 7 caps minimum lot size at 5,000 sq.ft. (and frontage at 50 ft) for single-family homes by right, limited to lots with access to both public water and public sewer. Modeled at 10 units/acre on subdivision-eligible parcels inside MassDEP public water AND sewer service areas (the conjunctive utility test in the petition). Retained municipal setback/bulk/height controls and the untouched Subdivision Control Law are not discounted, consistent with other Option #1 estimates.

* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Michigan

16K* potential new homes/year +73% annual supply increase 9 bills
View State Playbook
HB 5529 Substantial
9K potential new homes/year
Option #1: 6K · Option #2: 3K
Playbook Options #1-2
Caps minimum lot sizes for detached single-family homes at 1,500 sq.ft. in areas served by public water and sewer statewide.
Methodology

For Option #1, data is limited to properties with public water and sewer access. As a proxy for public water and sewer, tract size and density are used. At a minimum lot size of 1,500 sq.ft., approximately 13 homes per acre on average are assumed.

HB 5530 Substantial
9K potential new homes/year
Option #1: 6K · Option #2: 3K
Playbook Options #1-2
Caps minimum lot sizes for detached single-family homes at 1,500 sq.ft. in areas served by public water and sewer statewide.
Methodology

For Option #1, data is limited to properties with public water and sewer access. As a proxy for public water and sewer, tract size and density are used. At a minimum lot size of 1,500 sq.ft., approximately 13 homes per acre on average are assumed.

HB 5585 Moderate
6K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #2 (ADU only)
Allows for by-right development of ADUs in land zoned for single-family residential.
Methodology

Assumes ADUs are built on land up to a 100% land share.

HB 5584 Moderate
790 potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #2
Requires local governments to permit duplexes in any zoning district where single-family homes are allowed.
Methodology

This bill permits duplexes by-right. Thus, for lot splits, we assume up to two are allowed. For more, see Michigan state on the AEI Housing Center Light Touch Density Price Chart: <https://heat.aeihousingcenter.org/toolkit/ltd_chart>.

HB 5531 KISS
KISS
Reforms local site plan review procedures by requiring local governments to approve, reject, or conditionally approve site plans within 60 days after receipt.
HB 5532 KISS
KISS
Raises the threshold required to file a protest petition against zoning amendments that increase housing density.
HB 5581 KISS
KISS
Zoning ordinances are prohibited from imposing minimum dwelling size requirements of more than 500 sq.ft. for a dwelling.
HB 5582 KISS
KISS
Municipalities may not mandate more than one parking space per dwelling unit for multifamily residential use.
HB 5583 KISS
KISS
Establishes statewide limits on residential setback requirements in jurisdictions located within or adjacent to a metropolitan statistical area. Caps front setbacks at 15 feet and side and rear setbacks at 5 feet.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Minnesota

0* potential new homes/year 6 bills
View State Playbook
✓ Enacted HF 1141 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
An omnibus housing finance and tenant-protection bill. Authorizes the Housing Finance Agency to issue up to an additional $50 million in housing infrastructure bonds with corresponding general-fund debt-service appropriations through 2049, modifies the Minnesota housing tax-credit eligible-recipient and disqualification rules, raises the tax-exempt "aggregate bond limitation" for residential rental projects, creates capacity-building grants, and broadens HFA fund-transfer, reporting, and electronic-meeting authority. It adds extensive manufactured-home-park protections and prohibits private-equity companies that own 100+ single-family homes from holding such homes, enforced by the attorney general with a $100,000-per-violation penalty.
✓ Enacted HF 1268 KISS
KISS
A common-interest-community (condo/HOA/cooperative) governance law that modifies association powers and duties, caps interest on delinquent assessments (8%) and late fees (greater of $20 or 5%), limits fines and restricts attorney-fee recovery, expands unit-owner notice/comment, open-meeting, and document-availability rights, sets director term limits, modifies foreclosure and payment-application rules. Prohibits local governments from conditioning residential development approvals on, or otherwise requiring, the creation of a homeowner's association.
✓ Enacted HF 3425 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
A one-time appropriations bill to provide $10,000,000 for the state supportive-housing program, of which $9,000,000 is earmarked for grants to federal HUD Continuum of Care grantees whose FY2024 contracts expired or will expire before December 31, 2026 and who face funding gaps. It waives competitive-application and procurement requirements to allow noncompetitive awards, permits funds as supplemental emergency support for permanent supportive housing, rapid rehousing, transitional housing, and system activities, and requires grantees to report every 90 days.
✓ Enacted SF 1750 KISS
KISS
A common-interest-community (condo/HOA/cooperative) governance law that modifies association powers and duties, caps interest on delinquent assessments (8%) and late fees (greater of $20 or 5%), limits fines and restricts attorney-fee recovery, expands unit-owner notice/comment, open-meeting, and document-availability rights, sets director term limits, modifies foreclosure and payment-application rules. Prohibits local governments from conditioning residential development approvals on, or otherwise requiring, the creation of a homeowner's association.
✓ Enacted SF 203 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
An omnibus housing finance and tenant-protection bill. Authorizes the Housing Finance Agency to issue up to an additional $50 million in housing infrastructure bonds with corresponding general-fund debt-service appropriations through 2049, modifies the Minnesota housing tax-credit eligible-recipient and disqualification rules, raises the tax-exempt "aggregate bond limitation" for residential rental projects, creates capacity-building grants, and broadens HFA fund-transfer, reporting, and electronic-meeting authority. It adds extensive manufactured-home-park protections and prohibits private-equity companies that own 100+ single-family homes from holding such homes, enforced by the attorney general with a $100,000-per-violation penalty.
✓ Enacted SF 3595 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
A one-time appropriations bill to provide $10,000,000 for the state supportive-housing program, of which $9,000,000 is earmarked for grants to federal HUD Continuum of Care grantees whose FY2024 contracts expired or will expire before December 31, 2026 and who face funding gaps. It waives competitive-application and procurement requirements to allow noncompetitive awards, permits funds as supplemental emergency support for permanent supportive housing, rapid rehousing, transitional housing, and system activities, and requires grantees to report every 90 days.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Mississippi

0* potential new homes/year 0 bills
View State Playbook
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Missouri

0* potential new homes/year 0 bills
View State Playbook
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Nebraska

0* potential new homes/year 1 bills
View State Playbook
✓ Enacted LB 441 KISS
KISS
Enacts permitting reform by allowing virtual inspections for certain permits.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

New Hampshire

0* potential new homes/year 0 bills
View State Playbook
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

New Jersey

8K* potential new homes/year +38% annual supply increase 6 bills
View State Playbook
S1786 Weak
8K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #2 (ADU only)
Establishes a statewide framework legalizing ADUs on lots with single- or two-family homes. Applicable only to municipalities with a population density of less than 9,000 people per square mile, as determined by the most recent federal decennial census. Municipalities with greater than or equal to 9,000 people per square mile may elect to adopt an ordinance permitting ADUs by-right.
Methodology

Assumes ADUs are built on land up to a 100% land share.

A1206 KISS
KISS
Reduces the affordability term for middle-housing projects (2–4 units) or middle-housing conversions to 10 years.
S1810 Narrow Applicability
Impact not yet quantified
Playbook Options #2
Municipalities may designate areas called "Enhanced Transit Villages" within a half mile of transit hubs where residential development may occur at higher densities. Within ¼ mile of a central transit point, residential development must be allowed at a density of at least 50 units per acre; beyond ¼ mile, at least 25 units per acre. All designations require opt-in by eligible municipalities. Income limits: 30% of residential units in an enhanced transit village shall be affordable housing, with 10% each for low-income, moderate-income, and middle-income housing. This 30% affordability requirement is expected to reduce the practical supply impact by roughly that proportion.
S3410 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Establishes an Entry-Level Home Production Incentive Program administered by the New Jersey Housing and Mortgage Finance Agency (HMFA) to fill financing gaps in housing developments serving households up to 120% of area median income.
S3718 KISS
KISS
Reduces parking requirements near public transportation.
Stranded Assets Narrow Applicability
Impact not yet quantified
Playbook Options #3
Legislation to allow vacant commercial spaces — office buildings, office parks, strip malls, or other vacant commercial spaces — to be repurposed for housing.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

New Mexico

0* potential new homes/year 0 bills
View State Playbook
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

New York

0* potential new homes/year 8 bills
View State Playbook
S.3545 KISS
KISS
Mandates that agencies review and streamline their current policies regarding environmental quality reviews for certain housing development projects.
S.529 KISS
KISS
Establishes local initiatives housing task forces to develop best practices for local governments to incentivize housing development.
S.538 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Establishes a review of rent-controlled apartments to ensure that they are occupied by people who need affordable housing. Persons whose income exceeds 125% of area median income are ineligible to reside in rent-controlled housing.
S.576 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Establishes a manufactured housing tax credit.
S.8489 KISS
KISS
Establishes a real property tax freeze credit for taxpayers in certain school districts.
S.850 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Establishes a first-time homebuyer tax credit.
S.852 KISS
KISS
Exempts homebuyers who rehabilitate properties from property tax reassessment.
S.9270 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Creates a subpart of the housing court to hear housing matters related to buildings of 35 units or less.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

North Carolina

6K* potential new homes/year +9% annual supply increase 1 bills
View State Playbook
✓ Enacted SB 445 Moderate
6K potential new homes/year
Option #2: 4K · Option #3: 2K
Playbook Options #2-3
A broad omnibus regulatory reform bill that requires cities of 80,000+ in counties of 1,000,000+ to allow residential and mixed-use buildings as a use by right on redeveloping commercial, business, and light-industrial parcels and cities of 50,000+ outside the coastal area to allow at least one accessory dwelling unit (attached or detached) per single-family detached lot.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Ohio

8K* potential new homes/year +29% annual supply increase 6 bills
View State Playbook
HB 361 Substantial
8K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #1
A permitting-process reform bill that imposes statewide shot clocks on local land-use decisions, creates a third-party private inspector system, and extends the subdivision plat-approval clock to 90 days (retaining the existing deemed-approved remedy) and caps the minimum lot area a city or village plat rule may require at 4,800 square feet.
Methodology

For a minimum lot size of 4,800, approximately 10 homes per acre on average are assumed.

HB 313 Narrow Applicability
Impact not yet quantified
Playbook Options #1-2
Creates a competitive state grant program (the Housing Accelerator Fund) administered by the Department of Development. Townships and municipal corporations may apply for grants if they voluntarily adopt and implement at least three "pro-housing policies" from a statutory menu, including at least one from each of three categories: zoning/parking reforms, infrastructure/cost-reduction measures, and permitting/process streamlining. The menu includes optional items such as repealing minimum lot sizes, allowing four-plus-unit dwellings in 75% of territory, allowing ADUs, eliminating parking minimums, and permit shot clocks (review in ≤4 months or 30% faster).
HB 765 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Modifies the state's existing affordable single-family home tax credit, administered by the Ohio Housing Finance Agency.
HB 857 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Modifies the state's Residential Development Revolving Loan Program. The program lets the Department of Development make low-interest loans to counties, townships, and municipalities in lower-population counties (≤ 75,000 residents) with below-average homebuilding-permit activity, to fund water/sewer/transportation/utility infrastructure and to defray construction costs for single-family residential subdivisions, including conversions of commercial structures to housing.
SB 184 KISS
KISS
Creates a state "Housing Accelerator Fund" and a competitive grant program to encourage workforce housing in "residential economic development districts" — defined as all land within a 20-mile radius of a major economic development project committing at least $700 million in private investment. Counties, townships, and municipalities within such a district may apply for grants if they adopt pro-housing development policies and approve a major workforce housing project of at least 100 units.
SB 28 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Levies a new "housing market impact tax" of $2,000 per month on each single-, two-, or three-family dwelling owned by any person or affiliated group that holds 50 or more such homes in a single county.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Oklahoma

0* potential new homes/year 1 bills
View State Playbook
✓ Enacted SB 2018 KISS
KISS
Amends the definitions and assessment sections of the Ad Valorem Tax Code to require that newly constructed multifamily rental housing of 20 or more units (excluding LIHTC properties) be valued exclusively by the cost approach for its first two tax years after construction, or until first sale to an unrelated buyer. This offers temporary property-tax relief that can modestly reduce the carrying cost of new rental development during lease-up.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Oregon

0* potential new homes/year 6 bills
View State Playbook
✓ Enacted HB 4036 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Establishes the Housing Opportunity, Longevity and Durability (HOLD) Fund to be used by the Housing and Community Services Department for the preservation of existing affordable housing at risk of loss (expiring rent-assistance contracts, expiring affordability restrictions, properties in physical or financial distress, and manufactured dwelling parks at risk of sale or closure).
✓ Enacted HB 4037 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
An affordable-housing finance and property-tax bill that restructures the City and County Housing Project Funding Programs. Bundled with the finance provisions are several land-use reforms: it strengthens the requirement that local governments allow affordable housing by-right on commercially-zoned, religious-assembly, and public lands and permit commercial-to-residential building conversions, including affordable-housing density bonuses of 125–200% and reduced parking and impact-fee requirements. It also adds procedural streamlining — 63-day expedited land divisions with no hearings or third-party appeals, a "clear and objective" housing-application review process barring public hearings, and a broadened plan-review exemption for one- and two-family dwellings. The land-use mandates apply only to deed-restricted affordable housing (≤80% AMI, 30-year covenant) inside urban growth boundaries and are subject to local infrastructure and hazard carve-outs.
✓ Enacted HB 4082 KISS
KISS
Creates to a temporary program (sunsets January 2, 2033) a new pathway for cities and Metro to add sites to their urban growth boundaries specifically for housing for older persons and for manufactured dwellings, prefabricated structures, and manufactured dwelling parks.
✓ Enacted HB 4128 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Prohibits a "covered entity" (institutional real estate investor, or an entity funded by one, to purchase a single-family residence) from buying single-family residences unless one of seven exemptions applies. Most notably, it applies a 90-day public-listing waiting period giving owner-occupants first access.
✓ Enacted SB 1521 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Restructures the state's inclusionary-zoning (IZ) enabling law, moving the city/county authorization into new statutory sections and limiting the existing statute to Metro. It lets cities and counties require new multiunit housing (structures of 20+ units, or 10+ units in the Portland MSA outside Portland) to include below-market "affordable" units (≤80% AMI rent or locally set ownership limits), while requiring an in-lieu fee option.
✓ Enacted SB 1567 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Directs the Housing and Community Services Department (HCSD) to create a below-market, short-term loan program for "mixed income housing," establishes a dedicated loan fund seeded with a $20 million transfer, and amends housing-finance provisions to permit financing of mixed income housing.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Pennsylvania

8K* potential new homes/year +26% annual supply increase 7 bills
View State Playbook
HB 2185 Moderate
6K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #2
Municipalities must allow duplex, triplex, and quadplex housing as permitted uses by-right on any lot where single-family housing is allowed, depending on municipality size: - Duplexes in municipalities with population ≥ 5,000 or density ≥ 300 residents/sq.mi. - Duplexes or triplexes in municipalities with population ≥ 10,000 or density ≥ 400 residents/sq.mi. - Duplexes, triplexes, or quadplexes in municipalities with population ≥ 20,000 or density ≥ 500 residents/sq.mi.
Methodology

Population density figures are calculated using total land area and population for each city. Data are obtained from the U.S. Census.

HB 2186 Moderate
2K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #2 (ADU only)
All municipalities (cities, boroughs, and incorporated towns) must adopt an ordinance to permit the development of at least one accessory dwelling unit wherever a single-family detached dwelling unit is a permitted use.
Methodology

Assumes ADUs are built on land up to a 100% land share.

Impact not yet quantified
Playbook Options #3
Legislation pending introduction to require greater densities near public transit stops.
HB 2109 KISS
KISS
Local governments may not limit the number of occupants in a single dwelling based on familial relationship.
HB 2155 KISS
KISS
Removes parking mandates statewide with exceptions for ADA requirements.
HB 2192 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Establishes the Commonwealth Housing Council.
KISS
Possible KISS-aligned bills pending introduction, including: residential economic redevelopment; pre-approved housing plans; shot clocks and inspections; and dedicated funding for construction trade training.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Rhode Island

0* potential new homes/year 1 bills
View State Playbook
✓ Enacted H 8005 Sub A KISS
KISS
Modifies the state zoning enabling statute to impose statewide limits on residential parking requirements near transit.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

South Carolina

0* potential new homes/year 2 bills
View State Playbook
✓ Enacted H 5113 KISS
KISS
Bars local governments from imposing new zoning conditions that would terminate a property's lawful nonconforming use when a preexisting manufactured or mobile home is replaced with a newer one (not more than five years old) on the same residential site or within a manufactured-home community, subject to five exceptions. Extends modular-home placement and construction standards to on-frame modular homes and to delete the five-year age cap that limited when a modular display model could be placed for first residential use.
✓ Enacted S 780 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Amends two definitions in the Consumer Protection Code's high-cost and consumer-home-loan statute.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

South Dakota

0* potential new homes/year 2 bills
View State Playbook
✓ Enacted SB 3 KISS
KISS
Prohibits counties, municipalities, and townships from requiring a building permit for the repair or substantially-similar replacement of eight specified existing exterior parts of a detached single-family owner-occupied home: doors (same dimensions), downspouts, fascia, fencing panels/posts, gutters, nonstructural siding, soffits, and windows (same dimensions).
✓ Enacted SB 91 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Clarifies the procedure for a petition to change a county comprehensive plan or zoning ordinance. The bill requires such petitions to be filed with the county auditor, who forwards them to the planning commission (and copies the board of county commissioners); the commission must hold a public hearing within 45 days and make a recommendation, after which the board holds its own public hearing and acts on the request.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Tennessee

0* potential new homes/year 6 bills
View State Playbook
✓ Enacted HB 2509 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Creates a one-time "community workforce housing innovation pilot program" administered by the Tennessee Housing Development Agency, providing loans (interest-free when at least 80% of units are set aside long-term) to local public-private partnerships building or rehabilitating "workforce housing" for households earning more than 80% but no more than 150% of area median income.
✓ Enacted HB 2552 KISS
KISS
A statewide development-permitting process reform that imposes binding deadlines on every municipality and county. Local governments must approve a development application, plan, or site inspection — or issue a written deficiency report — within 30 business days, and an application is automatically deemed approved if they miss that deadline.
✓ Enacted HB 753 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Establishes a statewide property-tax assessment methodology for multi-unit rental housing (4+ units) that is subject to a government low-income use restriction, such as LIHTC/Section 42 properties. It requires assessors to value such housing using an income approach with a capitalization rate set 50-150 basis points above the national multifamily average, and to exclude the value of low-income housing tax credits from the assessment.
✓ Enacted SB 2237 KISS
KISS
A statewide development-permitting process reform that imposes binding deadlines on every municipality and county. Local governments must approve a development application, plan, or site inspection — or issue a written deficiency report — within 30 business days, and an application is automatically deemed approved if they miss that deadline.
✓ Enacted SB 2410 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Creates a one-time "community workforce housing innovation pilot program" administered by the Tennessee Housing Development Agency, providing loans (interest-free when at least 80% of units are set aside long-term) to local public-private partnerships building or rehabilitating "workforce housing" for households earning more than 80% but no more than 150% of area median income.
✓ Enacted SB 539 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Establishes a statewide property-tax assessment methodology for multi-unit rental housing (4+ units) that is subject to a government low-income use restriction, such as LIHTC/Section 42 properties. It requires assessors to value such housing using an income approach with a capitalization rate set 50-150 basis points above the national multifamily average, and to exclude the value of low-income housing tax credits from the assessment.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Utah

0* potential new homes/year 0 bills
View State Playbook
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Vermont

0* potential new homes/year 1 bills
View State Playbook
H.775 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Provides state investment to accelerate new mixed income, market rate, and affordable housing projects. Creates the Rural Housing Finance Pilot Program to stimulate development of affordable housing in rural Vermont communities.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Virginia

12K* potential new homes/year +35% annual supply increase 7 bills
View State Playbook
✓ Enacted SB 531 Substantial
12K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #2 (ADU only)
Zoning ordinances for single-family residential zoning districts shall include ADUs as a permitted use. Localities may require limitations, including dedicated parking for the ADU, proximity requirements to the primary dwelling, and that ADUs cannot be sold separately from the primary dwelling. Prohibition on requiring setbacks greater than those applied to primary dwellings or other accessory structures; conditions more restrictive than for single-family dwellings regarding height, rear, or side setbacks, lot size or coverage, or building frontage; and consanguinity or affinity between ADU and primary dwelling occupants.
Methodology

Assumes ADUs are built on land up to a 100% land share.

✓ Enacted HB 1212 Narrow Applicability
Impact not yet quantified
Playbook Options #1-2
Localities with a population of 20,000 or more must maintain at least one zoning district classification with minimum lot sizes no larger than 3,000 sq.ft. Localities have the discretion to choose where the small lot zoning district is located. If a locality already has a qualifying zoning district, they are exempt.
✓ Enacted HB 1279 KISS
KISS
Mixed-use or residential projects are allowed by-right on land owned by a property-tax exempt religious organization or 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization.
✓ Enacted HB 655 KISS
KISS
Would legalize manufactured housing in residential zones.
✓ Enacted HB 888 KISS
KISS
Would limit parking mandates for residential development.
✓ Enacted SB 346 KISS
KISS
Would legalize manufactured housing in residential zones.
✓ Enacted SB 388 KISS
KISS
Mixed-use or residential projects are allowed by-right on land owned by a property-tax exempt religious organization or 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Washington

41K* potential new homes/year +107% annual supply increase 15 bills
View State Playbook
✓ Enacted HB 2480 Complete
37K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #3
Any city or county required or choosing to plan under the Growth Management Act (GMA) with a population of 30,000 or more is prohibited from excluding residential uses in areas zoned for commercial or mixed-use development.
Methodology

Data is limited to counties required to fully plan under Washington's Growth Management Act with a population of 30,000 or greater. County population totals use the higher of the 2023 ACS 1-Year or 5-Year survey population estimates.

✓ Enacted SB 6026 Complete
37K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #3
Any city or county required or choosing to plan under the Growth Management Act (GMA) with a population of 30,000 or more is prohibited from excluding residential uses in areas zoned for commercial or mixed-use development.
Methodology

Data is limited to counties required to fully plan under Washington's Growth Management Act with a population of 30,000 or greater. County population totals use the higher of the 2023 ACS 1-Year or 5-Year survey population estimates.

✓ Enacted HB 1345 Weak
3K potential new homes/year
Playbook Options #2 (ADU only)
Authorizes (but does not require) counties to allow one accessory dwelling unit per parcel outside of urban growth areas. This bill is voluntary — counties may opt in but are not required to allow ADUs outside urban growth areas. Thus, the actual impact may be less than projected.
Methodology

Data is limited to areas outside of urban growth areas, as defined by Washington state. Urban growth area boundaries are obtained from the Washington State Geospatial Portal. This bill is entirely opt-in; the actual impact may be less than estimated. Assumes ADUs are built on land up to a 100% land share.

✓ Enacted HB 1859 KISS
KISS
Would enable religious organizations to provide housing on their land.
✓ Enacted HB 1974 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Establishes land banking authorities to help reduce the time to secure land for housing development.
✓ Enacted HB 2228 KISS
KISS
Establishes a technical advisory group to recommend updates to Washington's building code on scissor stairs in multi-unit permanent residences.
✓ Enacted HB 2266 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Requires cities and counties to allow transitional housing, permanent supportive housing, indoor emergency shelters, and indoor emergency housing in areas not zoned for industrial use, gives permitting certainty to those uses, and narrows the requirements that may be imposed on affordable housing developments as conditions for participation in certain programs to reporting and auditing requirements.
✓ Enacted HB 2304 KISS
KISS
Creates greater certainty for condo developers by allowing builders an alternative warranty path with specific coverage periods for defective workmanship and materials, defective plumbing, electrical, and ductwork distribution systems, and structural defects for a condo home located in a building containing 12 or fewer units and four or fewer stories.
✓ Enacted HB 2418 KISS
KISS
Streamlines the permit review process.
✓ Enacted SB 5156 KISS
KISS
Requires cities and counties to allow passenger elevators no larger than those that accommodate a wheelchair for apartment buildings with at most six stories and at most 24 homes.
✓ Enacted SB 5885 KISS
KISS
Would enable religious organizations to provide housing on their land.
✓ Enacted SB 6001 KISS
KISS
Establishes a technical advisory group to recommend updates to Washington's building code on scissor stairs in multi-unit permanent residences.
✓ Enacted SB 6027 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Modifies funding and exemptions related to providing and maintaining affordable housing.
✓ Enacted SB 6069 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Requires cities and counties to allow transitional housing, permanent supportive housing, indoor emergency shelters, and indoor emergency housing in areas not zoned for industrial use, gives permitting certainty to those uses, and narrows the requirements that may be imposed on affordable housing developments as conditions for participation in certain programs to reporting and auditing requirements.
✓ Enacted SB 6237 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Requires landlords to disclose rental property flooding history and flood risk.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

West Virginia

0* potential new homes/year 0 bills
View State Playbook
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Wisconsin

0* potential new homes/year 5 bills
View State Playbook
✓ Enacted AB 182 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Modifies Wisconsin's state low-income housing tax credit (LIHTC) program, which the Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Authority (WHEDA) administers. It (1) removes the requirement that a "qualified development" be financed with tax-exempt bonds, (2) directs WHEDA to allocate at least 35 percent of the value of state tax credits each year to qualified developments in rural areas, and (3) makes technical changes to the insurer credit so partners/members/shareholders may claim it.
✓ Enacted AB 453 KISS
KISS
A residential approval-streamlining and comprehensive-plan-consistency reform aimed at cities and villages (towns and counties are exempt). It requires municipal comprehensive plans to specify minimum and maximum net residential densities (units per acre) by area and 5-year increment, and then requires a political subdivision to grant a residential rezoning request within 90 days when the requested density falls within the locality's own planned density band, the area is adjacent to existing development served by existing infrastructure, and current housing supply does not meet demand.
✓ Enacted SB 178 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Modifies Wisconsin's state low-income housing tax credit (LIHTC) program, which the Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Authority (WHEDA) administers. It (1) removes the requirement that a "qualified development" be financed with tax-exempt bonds, (2) directs WHEDA to allocate at least 35 percent of the value of state tax credits each year to qualified developments in rural areas, and (3) makes technical changes to the insurer credit so partners/members/shareholders may claim it.
✓ Enacted SB 472 KISS
KISS
A residential approval-streamlining and comprehensive-plan-consistency reform aimed at cities and villages (towns and counties are exempt). It requires municipal comprehensive plans to specify minimum and maximum net residential densities (units per acre) by area and 5-year increment, and then requires a political subdivision to grant a residential rezoning request within 90 days when the requested density falls within the locality's own planned density band, the area is adjacent to existing development served by existing infrastructure, and current housing supply does not meet demand.
✓ Enacted SB 480 No Alignment
Impact not yet quantified
No Alignment
Amends the state tax-increment-financing statute to let cities and villages designate a tax incremental district as a "residential TID." A residential TID is exempt from the standard 12% equalized-value cap and is instead subject to a separate 3% cap.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

Wyoming

0* potential new homes/year 1 bills
View State Playbook
✓ Enacted HB 2 KISS
KISS
Would establish a permitting shot clock.
* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. "Poison pills" such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. See the playbook for more detail.

About this Tracker

This tracker monitors state-level legislation that could increase housing supply by reforming local zoning regulations. The bills tracked here align with the AEI Housing Center’s State Playbook, a comprehensive guide for state legislators to unlock housing production through targeted reforms.

What is “Annual Supply Increase”?

The annual supply increase percentage compares projected new homes from proposed legislation to the average number of homes built per year in each state from 2010-2023 (according to American Community Survey data). For example, +107% means the legislation could more than double the state’s typical annual housing production.

What are Playbook Options #1, #2, and #3?

The AEI Housing Center Playbook identifies three state-level options to unlock new housing supply using small lots:

KISS (Keep It Short and Simple) reforms eliminate unnecessary complexity in the homebuilding process. These include:

Playbook Alignment Ratings

Each bill is rated on how closely it aligns with the Playbook’s recommended provisions, measured as a percentage of the Playbook option’s projected homes:

* Housing supply projections depend on KISS implementation. “Poison pills” such as rent control, income requirements, and/or municipal discretion can reduce or eliminate benefits. Projections assume that bills with similar reforms are independent from one another. See the playbook for more detail.

Read the full methodology and report